Maps

free counters

Monday, 8 April 2013

UPS and their safety tweet


UPS UK (@UPS_UK)
Training is the cornerstone of safety in UPS’s global operations. Read how we train UPSers in safety: bit.ly/XPUXBG

Discuss



Mike Whitehead (@MikeWhiteheadSB)
@UPS_UK @UPS by allowing untrained employees to drive forklifts, I think not

Mike Whitehead (@MikeWhiteheadSB)
@UPS_UK @UPS by cancelling annual training. I think not

Mike Whitehead (@MikeWhiteheadSB)
@UPS_UK @UPS by failing to follow up on tachograph infringements, I think not

Mike Whitehead (@MikeWhiteheadSB)
@UPS_UK @UPS by failing to address working time issues, I think not

Now I'm sure that UPS will try and claim that this is harassment, but it was UPS that tweeted about safety.
EVERY single one of my points is 100% accurate.
EVERY single one of my posts has been 100% honest, except the statement by Albert Graham.

I am still asking....

Why are the HSE not interested? especially when you consider that this contains nothing about bullying.

Why are VOSA and the DfT not responding to me?

Why is Unite supporting UPS, you would have thought that I would be giving them some ammunition to improve working conditions for their members. It  would seem that the union are only interested in lining their own pockets........by whatever means.  (cue more bollocks from Albert)

Albert Graham was not my only contact with Unite. Richard Bedford would also seem to be happy for UPS to harass, intimidate and bully his members.



FACE

EGG

Coming soon


UPS Ping Pong


Walter Mitty criticized the figures that I used, yet he still reports the following;

My (Walter Mitty) findings were as follows:-
These 6 drivers had a total of 24 Infringements (2 had zero infringements)
10 were failure to take a break before 6 hours (work period exceeded)
6 insufficient break (ranging from 22 minutes short to 9 minutes short)
7 NO break taken (2 of these driver worked just over 6 hours and 4 were actually on drivers at the bottom of your list, i.e. a low planned (and actual) day)
I am intrigued as to why you choose to use an internal planned day versus the actual drivers day, as any infringements would be based on the actual drivers working day,
Why were there any, you have to ask yourself. Why? In Mitty´s words, would drivers choose to break the law? These figures were 2 years after I had provided evidence at a Centre planning meeting that drivers were;
Failing to take a break before 6 hours
Taking an insufficient break
Not taking any break
Absolutely no surprise that these are the issues Walter Mitty listed.
These issues had been continuing throughout this 2 year period.
The internal planned day showed that we were planning to over dispatch drivers. If we were planning to over despatch drivers then we are expecting them to cut corners. To cut corners, one of the things that they might need to do is work through their legal breaks. This is not CHOOSING (Walter Mitty´s word) to be non-compliant.
How can you discipline a driver for being non-compliant, when you are giving him an impossible task?
I was showing the root cause, as we had to do on all out pointless action plans, of the problem, which was where we needed to start in resolving the non-compliance issues.

You are part of the solution as a member of the management team and as part of your responsibilities you need to tackle these issues at the root cause.
This is why the issues of over dispatching were raised with my Centre Manager. Preload (Loaders) blamed the Manager, the Manager blamed Preload. Walter Mitty´s e-mail was dated 17th July 2011, the earliest proof that I raised issues was July 2009. Why did I have to do over my Manager´s head in relation to solving integrity issues? Nothing had changed in 2 years.
Where was my Centre Manager getting his directions? From his Division Manager. This wass Walter Mitty and his predecessor bullying Bob Burrows. Why did nothing change after conversations with Walter and Bob?

How could I change a culture driven by my Manager and his 2 Managers? When I took this higher up to Colaizzo & Miller there was still the same attitude. Where did their instructions come from? I never had this question answered but I can only assume that it came from the States.

When this is part of your OCS role?
It is quite true that it was part of my role as an on car supervisor to train drivers. It was not part of my role as an OCS to be on road delivering 5 days a week doing a full route. When I say full, I define this as 100% (or more) of the regular drivers dispatch. It is impossible to do any more than a bare minimum of OCS work when expected to do this level of on-road delivery. UPS expected 100% OCS work in addition to any delivery work being done. Why was I victimised and sent out on road so often, when OCS´s in other Centre´s weren´t even on road doing OCS work? How can an OCS do his work without doing any training rides?

It is Steves job to manage you and in turn it is your job to manage drivers.

See above.
I have spoken to Steve O’Donnell who advises he is also working through the list and advising the drivers of their requirement to take a break and equally that this break must be taken before they have completed 4.5 hours driving or 6 hours duty
Steve obviously didn´t understand the instructions.
No surprise, bearing in mind he destroyed the evidence that would have proved me right. I can still, however, provide the reports as generated by Tachomaster (already posted on here) that shows the level of fines that could have been levied on the drivers had they been pulled at any time by the Police or VOSA.

I will close reiterating my comments in my email of 17th July; you are part of the solution as a member of the management team and as part of your responsibilities you need to tackle these issues at the root cause.

Ah, VOSA, that reminds me.

Sunday, 7 April 2013

While I'm talklng updates

Bugger all from any other institution that I have questioned.
Is it costing UPS a fortune to silence the lambs?

Unite-the union

Continue to ignore any requests for information or a follow-up to Albert Graham's claim that he had been to the Police.
It's another week, another week of silence.
Why wouldn't Unite want information about UPS that would strengthen their hand.
How can it mean anything but Unite being complicit in the activities of UPS?

Friday, 5 April 2013

Peter James

After what seems an age, have finished XO by Jeffrey Deaver. It's taken so long to read that I sort of lost the plot with it. On to my 3rd PJ book now and it's rattling along well.

A few choices excerpts, read into them what you want


“And recently it hadn’t been a question of Branson’s oneupmanship getting the better of his competitive nature. Grace was on a mission to learn, to educate himself, to fill that vast cultural black hole inside his head. He had slowly come to the realization, during the past month, that his brain was a repository for pages and pages of police training manuals, rugby, football, motor-racing and cricketing facts, and not much else. And that needed to change. Quickly.”


“That movie,’ he rambled. ‘The Third Man. Carol Reed directed. The music. The zither. Gets me every time. Orson Welles peaked early, couldn’t ever repeat his early success, that was his tragedy. Poor bastard. Made some of the greatest movies of all times. But what do most people remember him for? The fat man who did the sherry commercials.”


“One quotation from a philosopher he had come across recently had given him some solace, and had taken up permanent residence in his mind. It was from Sr Kierkegaard, who wrote, ‘Life must be lived forward, but it can only be understood backwards.”


“She’s been doing all these self-improvement courses. I told you she keeps buying me these books, Men Are from Mars,Women Are from Venus, yeah? Why Women Can’t Read Maps and Men Can’t Find Stuff in Fridges, or some crap like that. Right? Well, she’s been getting angrier and angrier that I keep coming home late and she misses her courses cos she’s stuck with the kids. Right?”


“She was a very attractive, very strong-willed lady in her late twenties who had always made it abundantly clear who was boss in the Branson household. Glenn might have worn the trousers, but his face poked out through the fly buttons.”


“He stopped a courteous distance behind the first of the four balls on the fairway, noticing with some smugness just how far in front of the others his own ball was. Now that he was closer he could see just how good his drive had been. It was lagged up less than ten feet from the green.”


“The club secretary’s office at the North Brighton Golf Club had a military feel which reflected the secretary’s own background, as a retired army major who had managed to survive active service in the Falklands and Bosnia with his important bits – and most important of all, his golf handicap – intact.”


“The blowflies hadn’t arrived yet either, but they wouldn’t be long. Blowflies – or bluebottles, as they were more attractively named – could smell death from five miles away. About the same distance as newspaper reporters, of which species there was already one outside the gates, questioning the constable guarding the entrance and, from the reporter’s body language, not getting much from him.”


“Grace fell silent, thinking. He always found it easier to park his God questions safely away and to think about them only when it suited him. He wasn’t an atheist, not even really an agnostic. He did believe in something – or at least he wanted to believe in something – but he could never define exactly what. He always fell short of being able to openly accept the concept of God. And then immediately after that he would feel guilty. But ever since Sandy had disappeared, and all his prayers had gone unanswered, much of his faith had eroded.”


“Stress could cause people mental problems, make the brain function in weird ways, and he’d been under plenty of stress lately”


“The whole damn beach was a sewer of bare flesh. Bodies in skimpy clothing. White, red, brown, black. Flaunting themselves. Some of the women topless, bitch whores. He watched one waddling around, straggly ginger hair down to her shoulders, tits down to her stomach, stomach down to her pelvis, swigging a bottle of beer or lager – too far away to tell which – fat arse sticking out of a skein of electric blue nylon, thighs dimpled with cellulite. Wondered what she’d look like in his gas mask with her straggly ginger pubes jammed against his face. Wondered what it would smell like down there. Oysters?”











Excerpts From: Peter, James. “Not Dead Enough.”

Cracking series of books so far if you like your crime books

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Now why would Albert block my e-mail?


*** ATTENTION ***

Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- The delivery status notification errors -----".

The line beginning with "Diagnostic-Code:" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered.  The following lines contains the
RFC822 header of the original email message.

Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator.

--AOL Postmaster

----- The delivery status notification errors -----


<Albert's email address removed from here>: host core-mhe003b.r1000.mail.aol.com[172.29.239.152]
    said: 554 5.7.1 Your email could not be delivered because the recipient is
    only accepting email from specific email addresses. If you feel you
    received this in error, please contact the recipient directly and ask them
    to check their email settings. (in reply to end of DATA command)

Monday, 1 April 2013

Merkins again

It's hello to the States again

Google tells me you're there.

Strange how you pop up when I post.



Edit:
Hells teeth, you were straight in on that last post.
Have you got a UPS alertomometer?

Treadmill of truth

It's been a long hard month.
That's not even counting for Mum being in hospital.
Leapt out of bed this morning at 7.30 (that's very late for me) realised it was light and thought I was late for work. Grabbed my phone, was surprised that there were no missed calls or messages on it then realised that it was Easter Monday.
Went back to bed and surfaced at 10.45, before realising that the clock that I could see was one that I hadn't changed, so 11.45.
Bearing in mind that I went to bed at around 9pm, and was promptly asleep, that's Rip Van Winkle for me.
Still feel totally zonked.

Have to work tomorrow before going to Spain first thing Wednesday. I need the break, but can I switch off?

My solicitor keeps requesting different information which then needs cross referencing back to my original files, you've seen how much info I've got, there's been some long hours put in.

Guitar God Johnny Boyes prompted a reminder of how hard everyone works compared with footballers. Can't play 2 games a week. What a load of bollocks. Take Mark Cavendish for example, & I know people will say cycling = drugs, but what does Mark do before the sprint finish? and it's not just 2 races a week.

(We interrupt this post to say, Hall of the Mountain King now playing)

I want to say UPS I'm coming to get you, but that would sound like a threat.
So when is a threat a promise and vice versa?

The UPS crooks will soon be found out

Hopefully this will now be the final submission to my solicitor and the ball will start rolling properly.







Taxation

Can anyone explain why the rich don't have to contribute by paying higher taxes?
Bearing in mind that the rich will include those tossers (other descriptions are available) that caused the problems in the first place.




IDS v the poor


So why does IDS need his vast salary.......not forgetting he could probably get by just on his expenses alone.

The Work and Pensions Secretary said he could get by on £7.57 per day if he "had to", as he defended a raft of cuts to welfare payments coming into force today.
Mr Duncan Smith's current salary gives him £1,581.02 a week or £225 a day after tax.
Labour has branded today the start of 'Black April' as a number of cuts and freezes in benefits are taking effect today.
However, Mr Duncan Smith criticised the language of his opponents who claim ministers are hurting the poor.
Speaking on BBC Radio Four's Today programme, he said the Coalition is not "attacking or slashing" benefits claimants, but trying to reform the system to make it "fair".
He also admitted the overall welfare bill will carry on rising. Benefit payments to people of working age will only fall to levels last seen in 2009 under the Labour Government by the end of this parliament.
The total bill for all benefits and tax credits is forecast to carry on rising by billions a year well into the second half of the decade.
Mr Duncan Smith said the decision to raise benefits by just one per cent per year - lower than the rate of inflation - is a much better deal than people are getting in other countries.
"What we’re doing, the one per cent restriction we’ve made to the rise in benefits is still a one per cent rise," he said.
"If you were sitting in Ireland or Portugal or many of those other countries, they are actually seeing real cash cuts. So what we’re trying to do is to get control of the welfare bill but to make sure it lowers and it lowers in a way that we can be as fair as possible to people. Without actually slashing or attacking people, we are trying to reform it and change it.”
Mr Duncan Smith, who married into a family of multi-millionaires, insisted he could live on £53 a week after a housing benefit claimant said this is how much money he has a week.
David Bennett, who is in his 50s, is given housing benefit to help him with accommodation costs but said he only has £53 to live on after that.
The market trader earned around £2,700 last year working between 50 and 70 hours a week. Mr Bennett said he has had to borrow money after his housing benefit was cut from £75 a week to £57 per week. His income works out at around £53 per week.
However, most people earning this little would be eligible for about another £36 per week in tax credits if they worked more than 30 hours per week.
The current rate of jobseekers' allowance is up to £56.25 a week for people between the ages of 16 and 24, and up to £71 for an adult over that age.
Mr Duncan said he could cope with a low income if he had to do so.
"If I had to, I would," he said. "The reality is what we are trying to make certain is that the amount of money that taxpayers pay sees some value at the end of it in terms of people being supported.
"There’s been a huge amount of money which, in the course of the welfare system now, has absolutely been wasted.”
After his interview, more than 3,000 people signed an internet petition challenging the Work and Pensions Secretary to live on this amount.
Writing in today's Daily Telegraph, Mr Duncan Smith and George Osborne, the Chancellor, said the Coalition is “restoring the original values of the welfare state”.