Addendum

Scraped a few bits off the cutting room floor for the final edit of more questions for Roger

Nigel Harnell’s re-instatement

• As above, the Company must have Unfairly Dismissed Nigel if the company are re-instating him.
• Why are the details of Nigel’s appeal meeting being spread around the Centre? Surely this should be confidential. Pre-loaders do not need to know that “Nigel has to grovel” to the Company to get his job back. Nigel, as per Gavin Muldoon’s statement, did nothing worse than any other driver. He was also not as aggressive as Ahmed Patel had admitted that he was. (See racism comments)
• Why are the details of Nigel’s resignation also being bandied about? This should have gone no further than Steve, Dan and the other Supervisor.
• Why are only negative comments about employees being stated and not negative comments about the Company? There should be some balance about what is being said. Nigel puts one foot out of place and he’s the Devil. The Company continually breaks the law, fails to follow Procedures and Policies and yet claims to be whiter than white.

E-mailed on Tuesday night